Title of article :
Efficacy and Outcomes of Intrathecal Analgesia as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Colon and Rectal Surgical Patients
Author/Authors :
Merchea, Amit Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery - Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville - FL - USA , Lovely, Jenna K Hospital Pharmacy Services - Mayo Clinic - Rochester - MN - USA , Jacob, Adam K Department of Anesthesiology - Mayo Clinic - Rochester - MN - USA , Colibaseanu, Dorin T Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery - Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville - FL - USA , Kelley, Scott R Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery - Mayo Clinic - Rochester - MN - USA , Mathis, Kellie L Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery - Mayo Clinic - Rochester - MN - USA , Spears, Grant M Department of Biostatistics - University of Rochester - Rochester - MN - USA , Huebner, Marianne Department of Statistics - Michigan State University - East Lansing - MI - USA , Larson, David W Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery - Mayo Clinic - Rochester - MN - USA
Abstract :
Purpose. Multimodal analgesia is an essential component of an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). An ERP that includes the use of single-injection intrathecal analgesia (IA) has been shown to decrease morbidity and cost and shorten length of stay (LOS). Limited data exist on safety, feasibility, and the optimal IA regimen. Our objective was to characterize the e6cacy, safety, and
feasibility of IA within an ERP in a cohort of colorectal surgical patients. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of all
consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent open or minimally invasive colorectal surgery from October 2012 to
December 2013. All patients were enrolled in an institutional ERP that included the use of single-injection IA. Demographics,
anesthetic management, e6cacy (pain scores and opiate consumption), postoperative ileus (POI), adverse e9ects, and LOS are
reported. Results. 601 patients were identi;ed. (e majority received opioid-only IA (91%) rather than a multimodal regimen.
Median LOS was 3 days. Overall rate of ileus was 16%. Median pain scores at 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours were 3, 2, 3, 4, and 3,
respectively. (ere was no di9erence in postoperative pain scores, LOS, or POI based on intrathecal medication or dose received.
Overall, development of respiratory depression (0.2%) or pruritus (1.2%) was rare. One patient required blood patch for postdural
headache. Conclusion. Intrathecal analgesia is safe, feasible, and e6cacious in the setting of ERP for colorectal surgery. All
regimens and doses achieved a short LOS, low pain scores, and a low incidence of POI. (is trial is registered with Clinicaltrails. gov NCT03411109.
Keywords :
intrathecal analgesia (IA) , enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) , Outcomes , Intrathecal Analgesia , Colon , Rectal Surgical Patients
Journal title :
Surgery Research and Practice