• Title of article

    Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Author/Authors

    Wei, Yali Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene - School of Public Health - Shandong University, Jinan, China , Wang, Shuli Department of Medical Imaging - Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated of Shandong University, Jinan, China , Meng, Yan Department of Nutrition - Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated of Shandong University, Jinan, China , Yu, Qingtao Department of Endocrinology - The People Hospital of Huaiyin Jinan, Jinan, China , Wang, Qian Department of Nutrition - Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated of Shandong University, Jinan, China , Xu, Hongzhao Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene - School of Public Health - Shandong University, Jinan, China , Yuan, Huacai Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene - School of Public Health - Shandong University, Jinan, China , Li, Xiaoxu Department of Nutrition - Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated of Shandong University, Jinan, China , Chen, Liyong Department of Nutrition - Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated of Shandong University, Jinan, China

  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    1
  • To page
    10
  • Abstract
    Context: Vitamin D (VD) has been found to play a key role in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This meta-analysis explored the effects of VD supplementation in patients with NAFLD. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to find randomized control trials (RCTs) that measured the changes between the VD supplement group and the control group until May 2019. Standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated when data units were different, otherwise weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI was calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: Eight RCTs with 624 individuals were extracted. The main indicators, including serum alanine aminotransferase (WMD = -0.052; 95% CI: -3.740, 3.636; P = 0.978) and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations (WMD = -0.479; 95% CI: -2.791, 1.833; P = 0.685) were not significantly different between the intervention and placebo groups. In addition, no significant intergroup difference was observed in the following secondary indicators: fasting blood glucose (WMD = 0.466; 95% CI: -5.313, -10.879; P = 0.061), homeostasis model assessment (WMD = 0.380, 95% CI: -0.162, 0.923; P = 0.169), serum insulin concentration (WMD = 0.760; 95% CI: -0.532, 2.052; P = 0.249), high-density lipoprotein (WMD = -0.012; 95% CI: -0.188, 0.164; P = 0.891), and low-density lipoprotein (WMD = -0.115; 95% CI: -3.849, -3.620; P = 0.952). Conclusions: The results indicate thatVDsupplementation does not improve liver enzymes, insulin resistance, glucose metabolism parameters, and lipid levels in patients with NAFLD.
  • Keywords
    Meta-Analysis , Supplementation , Vitamin D , Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
  • Serial Year
    2020
  • Record number

    2611697