Title of article :
Antithrombotic Dilemmas after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Watchman Device Placement
Author/Authors :
Ahuj, Tania New York University Langone Health - Department of Pharmacy, New York, NY, USA , Murphy, Scarlett New York University Langone Health - Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA , Sartori, Daniel J. New York University Langone Health - Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Abstract :
Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has dramatically shifted from warfarin, a
vitamin K antagonist, to the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. In patients with
contraindications to oral anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices, such as the Watchman™ device, may
be considered; however, temporary postimplantation antithrombotic therapy is still a recommended practice. We present a case
of complex antithrombotic management, post LAAO device implantation, designed to avoid drug interactions with concomitant
rifampin use and remained necessary secondary to subsequent device leak. This case highlights the challenges of antithrombotic
therapy post LAAO device placement in a complex, but representative, patient.
Keywords :
Antithrombotic Dilemmas , Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion , Watchman Device
Journal title :
Case Reports in Cardiology