Title of article :
Glioblastoma Break-in; Try Something New
Author/Authors :
Bogoyavlenskaya, Tatyana Alexandrovna Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy - First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia , Tyagunova, Ekaterina Evgenyevna The International School “Medicine of Future” of Biomedical Park of I.M. Sechenov - First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia , Kostin, Roman Konstantinovich The International School “Medicine of Future” of Biomedical Park of I.M. Sechenov - First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia , Zaharov, Alexander Sergeevich Department of Biological Chemistry with Course of Clinico-Laboratory Diagnostics - Faculty of Additional Professional Education of RyazSMU, Ryazan, Russia , Vasil’ev, Yuriy Leonidovich Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy - First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia , Vasilevna Kytko, Olesya Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy - First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
Pages :
10
From page :
1
To page :
10
Abstract :
Context: Glioblastoma is the most invasive brain tumor with a poor prognosis and rapid progression. The standard therapy (surgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) ensures survival only up to 18 months. In this article, we focus on innovative types of radiotherapy, various combinations of temozolomide with novel substances, and methods of their administration and vector delivery to tumor cells. Evidence Acquisition: For a detailed study of the various options for chemotherapy and radiotherapy, Elsevier, NCBI MedLine,Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Global Health, CyberLeninka, and RSCI databases were analyzed. Results: The most available method is oral or intravenous administration of temozolomide. More efficient is the combined chemotherapy of temozolomide with innovative drugs and substances such as lomustine, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and chloroquine, as well as olaparib. These combinations improve patient survival and are effective in the treatment of resistant tumors. Compared to standard fractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy, 30 fractions, 6 weeks), hypofractionated is more effective for elderly patients due to lack of toxicity; brachytherapy reduces the risk of glioblastoma recurrence, while radiosurgery with bevacizumab is more effective against recurrent or inoperable tumors. Currently, the most effective treatment is considered to be the intranasal administration of anti-Ephrin A3 (anti-EPHA3)-modified containing temozolomide butyl ester-loaded (TBE-loaded) poly lactide-coglycolide nanoparticles (P-NPs) coated with N-trimethylated chitosan (TMC) to overcome nasociliary clearance. Conclusions: Newradiotherapeutic methods significantly increase the survival rates of glioblastoma patients. Withsomeimprovement, it may lead to the elimination of all tumor cells leaving the healthy alive. New chemotherapeutic drugs show impressive results with adjuvant temozolomide. Anti-EPHA3-modified TBE-loaded P-NPs coated withTMChave high absorption specificity and kill glioblastoma cells effectively. A new “step forward” may become a medicine of the future, which reduces the specific accumulation of nanoparticles in the lungs, but simultaneously does not affect specific absorption by tumor cells.
Farsi abstract :
فاقد چكيده فارسي
Keywords :
EPHA3 Antibody , Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) , Nose-to-brain Delivery , Temozolomide , Brachytherapy , Gamma Knife Radiosurgery , External-beam Radiotherapy , Lomustine , Suberoylan Hydroxamic Acid , Olaparib
Journal title :
International Journal of Cancer Management
Serial Year :
2021
Record number :
2615655
Link To Document :
بازگشت