Author/Authors :
Bolcato, Matteo Department of Molecular Medicine - University of Padua, Padua, Italy , Feola, Alessandro Department of Experimental Medicine - University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy , Sanavio, Matteo Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health - Legal Medicine - University Hospital of Padua, Italy , Amadasi, Alberto Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC) - Legal Medicine - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy , Crenna, Stefano Department of Public Health - Experimental and Forensic Medicine - University of Pavia, Italy , Landi, Gianluca Department of Medicine Surgery and Neuroscience - Forensic Medicine - University of Siena - Siena Policlinic, Siena, Italy , Bonsignore, Alessandro Department of Legal and Forensic Medicine - University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy , Tettamanti, Camilla Department of Legal and Forensic Medicine - University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
Abstract :
Background. On 22 December 2017, Law No. 219 was approved in Italy entitled “Provisions on informed consent and advance treatment directives”. This article reports the results from a survey of the knowledge of medico-legal experts in Italy on these provisions, in addition to the ability of university health-care facilities in Italy to implement the principles of this new law. Methods. A survey questionnaire was sent to members of a scientific society. The society had 357 members and represented more than 75% of doctors in training and 32 university healthcare facilities in Italy. 27 of those facilities and 45% of the society’s mem-bers participated in this enquiry. Results. The majority (68%) of those interviewed felt they had acquired an adequate knowledge of the law but only 60% of them were able to indicate how to file legally valid advance directives (60% vs. 40%); only 37% knew how to draft a shared care plan. 89% of the pool felt that legal recognition of patient self-determination enhanced the care relationship. 74% of the facilities analyzed have organized training activities on the contents of the law but only 26% have updated their informed consent forms and procedures. 60% of the facilities perform medico-legal consultation activities and in 15% of the facilities there has been resistance to applying the law. Conclusion.Many of the facilities have set up training activities but lack effective implementation of those activities. With increased knowledge and organization this could be remedied. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Keywords :
informed consent , self-determination , advance directives , shared care plan , conscientious objection , legal medicine