Author/Authors :
Chaves NaCif, Gustavo Hospital Alvorada Moema, São Paulo, SP, Brazil , Moises Jose Pedro, ferNaNdo Hospital Alvorada Moema, São Paulo, SP, Brazil , YNoe de Moraes, viNiCius Hospital Alvorada Moema, São Paulo, SP, Brazil , ferNaNdes, MarCela Hospital Alvorada Moema, São Paulo, SP, Brazil , Carlos Bellot, João Hospital Alvorada Moema, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Abstract :
Objective: To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures
and their complications. Methods: Two hundred questionnaires
were distributed during the 36th Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress
(2016). Results: On suspicion of fracture without radiographic
confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while
43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In
stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster
cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt
for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole
fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treat-
ment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized
bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater
than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In
proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred
by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request
tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend
to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently
(16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02). Conclusions: We have provided
an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It
should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely
to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend
surgical treatment of distal third fractures. Level of Evidence
IV,Cross-sectional survey.
Keywords :
Scaphoid bone , Fractures , bone , Diagnosis , Pseudar- throsis , Cross-sectional studies