Author/Authors :
Ali, Arafat Department of Radiology - University of Cincinnati Medical Center - Cincinnati - OH, USA , Rybicki, Frank J. Department of Radiology - University of Cincinnati Medical Center - Cincinnati - OH, USA , Ballard, David H. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology - Washington University School of Medicine - MO, USA , Althobaity, Waleed King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia , Christensen, Andy Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - University of Ottawa - Ottawa - ON, Canada , Sheikh, Adnan Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - University of Ottawa - Ottawa - ON, Canada , Geritano, Mariah Boston Children’s Hospital - Boston - MA, USA , Ho, Michelle Sidney Kimmel Medical College - Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia - PA, USA , Liacouras, Peter 3D Medical Applications Center - Walter Reed National Military Medical Center - Washington - DC, USA , Matsumoto, Jane Department of Radiology - Mayo Clinic - Rochester - MN, USA , Morris , Jonathan Department of Radiology - Mayo Clinic - Rochester - MN, USA , Ryan, Justin Rady Children’s Hospital - San Diego - CA, USA , Shorti, Rami Intermountain Healthcare - South Jordan - UT, USA , Wake, Nicole Department of Radiology - Montefiore Medical Center - Bronx - NY, USA
Abstract :
Medical 3D printing as a component of care for adults with cardiovascular diseases has expanded
dramatically. A writing group composed of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Special Interest Group
on 3D Printing (SIG) provides appropriateness criteria for adult cardiac 3D printing indications.
Methods: A structured literature search was conducted to identify all relevant articles using 3D printing technology
associated with a number of adult cardiac indications, physiologic, and pathologic processes. Each study was vetted
by the authors and graded according to published guidelines.
Results: Evidence-based appropriateness guidelines are provided for the following areas in adult cardiac care;
cardiac fundamentals, perioperative and intraoperative care, coronary disease and ischemic heart disease,
complications of myocardial infarction, valve disease, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac neoplasm, cardiac transplant and
mechanical circulatory support, heart failure, preventative cardiology, cardiac and pericardial disease and cardiac
trauma.
Conclusions: Adoption of common clinical standards regarding appropriate use, information and material
management, and quality control are needed to ensure the greatest possible clinical benefit from 3D printing. This
consensus guideline document, created by the members of the RSNA 3D printing Special Interest Group, will
provide a reference for clinical standards of 3D printing for adult cardiac indications.
Keywords :
3D printing , Appropriateness Guidelines , Quality Radiology , Additive Manufacturing , Anatomic Model , Adult Cardiology , Left Atrial Appendage , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement