Title of article :
DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy
Author/Authors :
Kamio, Takashi Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology - The Nippon Dental University - Chiyoda-ku - Tokyo , Japan , Suzuki, Madoka Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology - The Nippon Dental University - Chiyoda-ku - Tokyo , Japan , Kawai, Taisuke Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology - The Nippon Dental University - Chiyoda-ku - Tokyo , Japan , Asaumi , Rieko Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology - The Nippon Dental University - Chiyoda-ku - Tokyo , Japan
Abstract :
Extracting and three-dimensional (3D) printing an organ in a region of interest in DICOM images
typically calls for segmentation as a first step in support of 3D printing. The DICOM images are not exported to STL
data immediately, but segmentation masks are exported to STL models. After primary and secondary processing,
including noise removal and hole correction, the STL data can be 3D printed. The quality of the 3D model is
directly related to the quality of the STL data. This study focuses and reports on the DICOM to STL segmentation
performance for nine software packages.
Methods: Multidetector row CT scanning was performed on a dry human mandible with two 10-mm-diameter
bearing balls as a phantom. The DICOM image file was then segmented and exported to an STL file using nine
different commercial/open-source software packages. Once the STL models were created, the data (file) properties and
the size and volume of each file were measured, and differences across the software packages were noted.
Additionally, to evaluate differences between the shapes of the STL models by software package, each pair of STL
models was superimposed, with the observed differences between their shapes characterized as the shape error.
Results: The data (file) size of the STL file and the number of triangles that constitute each STL model were different
across all software packages, but no statistically significant differences were found across software packages. The
created ball STL model expanded in the X-, Y-, and Z-axis directions, with the length in the Z-axis direction (body axis
direction) being slightly longer than that in the other directions. The mean shape error between software packages of
the mandibular STL model was 0.11 mm, but there was no statistically significant difference between them.
Conclusions: Our results revealed that there are some differences between the software packages that perform the
segmentation and STL creation of the DICOM image data. In particular, the features of each software package
appeared in the fine and thin areas of the osseous structures. When using these software packages, it is necessary to
understand the characteristics of each.
Keywords :
STL file , 3D printing , Computed-aided design , DICOM image , FDM 3D printer , Oral and maxillofacial surgery , Patient-specific
Journal title :
3D Printing in Medicine