Author/Authors :
Boyer, Christen J. Molecular and Cellular Physiology - Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport - Louisiana, USA , Barzegar, Mansoureh Molecular and Cellular Physiology - Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport - Louisiana, USA , Winny Yun, J. Molecular and Cellular Physiology - Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport - Louisiana, USA , Alexander, J. Steven Molecular and Cellular Physiology - Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport - Louisiana, USA , Ballard, David H. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology - Washington University School of Medicine - St Louis, - MO, USA , Woerner, Jennifer E. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport - Louisiana, USA , Ghali, Ghali E. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport - Louisiana, USA , Boktor, Moheb Gastroenterology and Hepatology - Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport - Louisiana, USA , Wang, Yuping Obstetrics and Gynecology - LSU Health Sciences Center - Shreveport - Louisiana, USA
Abstract :
Three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures and 3D bioprinting have recently gained attention based on
their multiple advantages over two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures, which have less translational potential to
recapitulate human physiology. 3D scaffold supports, cell aggregate systems and hydrogels have been shown
to accurately mimic native tissues and support more relevant cell-cell interactions for studying effects of drugs
and bioactive agents on cells in 3D. The development of cost-effective, high-throughput and scaffold-free microtissue
assays remains challenging. In the present study, consumer grade 3D printing was examined as a fabrication method
for creation of high-throughput scaffold-free 3D spheroidal microtissues.
Results: Consumer grade 3D printing was capable of forming 96-well cell culture inserts to create scaffold-free
microtissues in liquid suspensions. The inserts were seeded with human glioblastoma, placental-derived mesenchymal
stem cells, and intestinal smooth muscle cells. These inserts allowed for consistent formation of cell density-controllable
microtissues that permit screening of bioactive agents.
Conclusion: A variety of different cell types, co-cultures, and drugs may be evaluated with this 3D printed microtissue
insert. It is suggested that the microtissue inserts may benefit 3D cell culture researchers as an economical assay
solution with applications in pharmaceuticals, disease modeling, and tissue-engineering.
Keywords :
3D printing , Screening , Spheroids , Microtissues