Title of article :
Biodistribution and Tumors MRI Contrast Enhancement of Magnetic Nanocubes, Nanoclusters, and Nanorods in Multiple Mice Models
Author/Authors :
Naumenko, V National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Garanina, A National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Nikitin, A National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Vodopyanov, S National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Vorobyeva, N National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Tsareva, Y National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Kunin, M Lomonosov Moscow State University - Moscow, Russia , Ilyasov, A National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Semkina, A National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Chekhonin, V Department of Medical Nanobiotechnology - Russian National Research Medical University - Moscow, Russia , Abakumov, M National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia , Majouga, A National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) - Moscow, Russia
Abstract :
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful technique for tumor diagnostics. Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are safe and
biocompatible tools that can be used for further enhancing MR tumor contrasting. Although numerous IONPs have been proposed
as MRI contrast agents, low delivery rates to tumor site limit its application. IONPs accumulation in malignancies depends on both
IONPs characteristics and tumor properties. In the current paper, three difierently shaped Pluronic F-127-modified IONPs
(nanocubes, nanoclusters, and nanorods) were compared side by side in three murine tumor models (4T1 breast cancer, B16
melanoma, and CT26 colon cancer). Orthotopic B16 tumors demonstrated more ecient IONPs uptake than heterotopic implants.
Magnetic nanocubes (MNCb) had the highest r2-relaxivity in vitro (300 mM−1
·s
−1
) compared with magnetic nanoclusters (MNCl,
104 mM−1
·s
−1
) and magnetic nanorods (MNRd, 51 mM−1
·s
−1
). As measured by atomic emission spectroscopy, MNCb also
demonstrated better delivery eciency to tumors (3.79% ID) than MNCl (2.94% ID) and MNRd (1.21% ID). Nevertheless, MNCl
overperformed its counterparts in tumor imaging, providing contrast enhancement in 96% of studied malignancies, whereas MNCb
and MNRd were detected by MRI in 73% and 63% of tumors, respectively. Maximum MR contrasting eciency for MNCb and
MNCl was around 6-24 hours after systemic administration, whereas for MNRd maximum contrast enhancement was found within
first 30 minutes upon treatment. Presumably, MNRd poor MRI performance was due to low r2-relaxivity and rapid clearance by
lungs (17.3% ID) immediately after injection. MNCb and MNCl were mainly captured by the liver and spleen without significant
accumulation in the lungs, kidneys, and heart. High biocompatibility and profound accumulation in tumor tissues make MNCb and
MNCl the promising platforms for MRI-based tumor diagnostics and drug delivery.
Keywords :
Magnetic , Biodistribution , MRI , Tumor