• Title of article

    Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques

  • Author/Authors

    Leal, Mário Lúcio Marques Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Loyola, Ana Beatriz Alkmim Teixeira Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Hueb, Alexandre Ciappina Department of Cardiac Surgery - Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Silva, José Dias da Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Mesquita, Marcos Department of Biostatistics - Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Paiva, Luiz Francisley de Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Guerrieri, Mauricio Landulfo Jorge Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Fernandes, João Paulo Nunes Intensive Care Department - Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Barros, Artur Costa Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre-MG, Brazil , Ferreira, Lydia Masako Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil

  • Pages
    11
  • From page
    680
  • To page
    690
  • Abstract
    Purpose: To compare the fixation of the central venous catheter (CVC) using two suture techniques. Methods: A clinical, analytical, interventional, longitudinal, prospective, controlled, single-blind and randomized study in adult, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. After admission and indication of CVC use, the patients were allocated to the Wing group (n = 35, catheter fixation with clamping wings and retainers) or Shoelace group (n = 35, catheter fixation using shoelace cross-tied sutures around the device). Displacement, kinking, fixation failure, hyperemia at the insertion site, purulent secretion, loss of the device, psychomotor agitation, mental confusion, and bacterial growth at the insertion site were evaluated. Results: Compared with the Wing group, the Shoelace group had a lower occurrence of catheter displacement (n=0 versus n =4; p = 0.04), kinking (n=0 versus n=8; p=0.001), and fixation failure (n=2 versus n=8; p=0.018). No significant difference was found in bacterial growth (n=20 versus n=14; p=0.267) between groups. Conclusion: The Shoelace fixation technique presented fewer adverse events than the Wing fixation technique.
  • Keywords
    Catheters , Vascular Access Devices , Suture Techniques , Microbiota , Blood Circulation
  • Journal title
    Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
  • Serial Year
    2017
  • Record number

    2617786