Author/Authors :
DOLATOWSKI, Filip C Departments of Orthopedics - Kongsvinger Hospital, Norway , ADAMPOUR, Mina Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo - Kongsvinger Hospital, Norway , FRIHAGEN, Frede Akershus University Hospital , Kongsvinger Hospital, Norway , STAVEM, Knut Oslo University Hospital - Kongsvinger Hospital, Norway , UTVÅG, Stein Erik Departments of Orthopedics - Kongsvinger Hospital, Norway , HOELSBREKKEN, Sigurd Erik Department of Orthopedic and Rheumatic Surgery - Kongsvinger Hospital, Norway
Abstract :
Background and purpose — It has been suggested that preopera-
tive posterior tilt of the femoral head may increase the risk of fi xa-
tion failure in Garden-I and -II femoral neck fractures. To inves-
tigate this association, we studied a cohort of 322 such patients.
Patients and methods — Patients treated with internal fi xation
between 2005 and 2012 were retrospectively identifi ed using hos-
pital records and the digital image bank. 2 raters measured the
preoperative posterior tilt angle and categorized it into 3 groups:
< 10°, 10–20°, and 20°. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) was
determined. Patients were observed until September 2013 (with
a minimum follow-up of 18 months) or until failure of fi xation
necessitating salvage arthroplasty. The risk of fi xation failure was
assessed using competing-risk regression analysis, adjusting for
time to surgery.
Results — Patients with a posterior tilt of 20° had a higher
risk of fi xation failure: 19% (8/43) as compared to 11% (14/127)
in the 10–20° category and 6% (9/152) in the < 10° category (p =
0.03). Posterior tilt of 20° increased the risk of fi xation failure,
with an adjusted hazard ratio of 3.4 (95% CI: 1.3–8.9; p = 0.01).
The interclass correlation coeffi cient for angular measurements
of posterior tilt was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92), and the IRR for
the categorization of posterior tilt into 3 groups was 0.76 (95%
CI: 0.69–0.81).
Interpretation — Preoperative posterior tilt of 20° in Gar-
den-I and -II femoral neck fractures increased the risk of fi xa-
tion failure necessitating salvage arthroplasty. The reliability of
the methods that we used to measure posterior tilt ranged from
good to excellent.