Author/Authors :
Pelosini Gaiarsa, Guilherme Universidade de São Paulo - Hospital das Clínicas - HCFMUSP - Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Reconstruction and Lengthening Group, São Paulo, SP, Brazil , Roberto dos Reis, Paulo Universidade de São Paulo - Hospital das Clínicas - HCFMUSP - Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Reconstruction and Lengthening Group, São Paulo, SP, Brazil , Edson Kojima, Kodi Universidade de São Paulo - Hospital das Clínicas - HCFMUSP - Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Reconstruction and Lengthening Group, São Paulo, SP, Brazil , Santos Silva, Jorge Universidade de São Paulo - Hospital das Clínicas - HCFMUSP - Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Reconstruction and Lengthening Group, São Paulo, SP, Brazil , Lucia Lei Munhoz Lima, Ana Universidade de São Paulo - Hospital das Clínicas - HCFMUSP - Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Reconstruction and Lengthening Group, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Abstract :
Objective: Non-union and persistence of infection at a fracture
site for long periods are always described as a challenge to
orthopedists, especially in cases of severe compound fractures
with comminution and segmental bone loss. This is a case series
of septic non-unions, using S53P4 bioactive glass for adjunctive
treatment, using internal syntheses or external fixators. The
objective is to retrospectively evaluate the results of the use of
S53P4 bioglass for the adjunctive treatment of septic non-unions.
Methods: We reviewed 18 patients with septic non-unions. The
patients were preoperatively classified using the Non-union
Scoring System (NUSS) and union outcomes were assessed by
the modified radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures.
Of the 18 patients treated, six underwent internal osteosynthesis
and 12 were treated with external fixators in combination with
bioactive glass grafting. Results: The patients had a mean
NUSS score of 56.6 (standard deviation of 7.6) and fracture
union was achieved according to the RUST score in 17 of 18
cases (94.4%), with a mean value of 10.2 (standard deviation
of 1.0). One patient was lost to follow-up. Reevaluation using
the modified RUST score was 12.3 (SD = 1.0), maintaining
union of 17/18. Conclusion: The fracture union rate was high,
according to the literature, as was control of infection. Level of
Evidence IV, Case series
Keywords :
Bone Diseases , Infectious , Fracture Healing , Bone Substitutes , Fractures , Ununited , Fracture Fixation , Osteomyelitis