Author/Authors :
JOHANSSON, Sandra Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology - Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark , CHRISTENSEN, Ole M Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology - Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark , THORSMARK, Anders H Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology - Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark
Abstract :
Background and purpose — Acute kidney injury is a known com-
plication of antibiotic use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is essential to
prevent periprosthetic infections after total hip replacement. We
experienced a rise in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI),
and in an effort to solve this problem, we changed our antibiotic
prophylaxis protocol. We investigated whether removing genta-
micin from our antibiotic protocol would cause fewer and less
severe cases of renal impairment.
Patients and methods — We performed a retrospective study
involving 136 cases of total hip replacement, with 66 patients
receiving dicloxacillin and gentamicin and 70 patients receiving
dicloxacillin alone.
Results — We found less cases of AKI in the dicloxacillin group
(p = 0.03): the mean creatine level in the dicloxacillin/gentami-
cin group was 126 (25–422) μmol/L whereas it was 93 (39–278)
μmol/L in the group that received dicloxacillin alone. We also
found that cases were less severe in the dicloxacillin group than in
the dicloxacillin/gentamicin group (p = 0.02). The relative risk of
developing AKI was 3 times higher if dicloxacillin and gentamicin
were both used (p = 0.02).
Interpretation — After removing gentamicin, there were fewer
and less severe cases of acute kidney injury
Keywords :
acute kidney injury , hip arthro-plasty , patients , receiving gentamicin and dicloxacillin