Author/Authors :
Park, Jaesub Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine - Yonsei University College of Medicine - Seoul, Korea , Oh, Seung-Taek Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine - Yonsei University College of Medicine - Seoul, Korea , Park, Sunyoung Department of Psychiatry - National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital - Goyang, Korea , Choi, Won-Jung Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine - Yonsei University College of Medicine - Seoul, Korea , Shin, Cheung Soo Department of Anesthesiology - Yonsei University College of Medicine - Seoul; Korea , Na, Se Hee , Kim, Jae-Jin Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine - Yonsei University College of Medicine - Seoul, Korea , Oh, Jooyoung Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering - Institute of Integrated Technology - Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology - Gwangju, Korea , Park, Jin Young Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine - Yonsei University College of Medicine - Seoul, Korea
Abstract :
Background: Delirium is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, so recent clinical guidelines recommended routine delirium monitoring in the ICU. But, its effect on the patient’s clinical outcome is still controversial. In particular, the effect of systems that
inform the primary physician of the results of monitoring is largely unknown.
Methods: The delirium notification program using bedside signs and electronic chart notifications was applied to the pre-existing
delirium monitoring protocol. Every patient was routinely evaluated for delirium, pain, and anxiety using validated tools. Clinical
outcomes, including duration of delirium, ICU stay, and mortality were reviewed and compared for 3 months before and after the program implementation.
Results: There was no significant difference between the two periods of delirium, ICU stay, and mortality. However, anxiety, an important prognostic factor in the ICU survivor’s mental health, was significantly reduced and pain tended to decrease.
Conclusions: Increasing the physician’s awareness of the patient’s mental state by using a notification program could reduce the
anxiety of ICU patients even though it may not reduce delirium. The results suggested that the method of delivering the results of
monitoring was also an important factor in the success of the delirium monitoring program.
Keywords :
anxiety , critical illness , delirium , intensive care units , pain , reminder systems