• Title of article

    Preliminary study of alcohol problem severity and response to brief intervention

  • Author/Authors

    Meredith, Lindsay R. Department of Psychology - University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA , Grodin, Erica N. Department of Psychology - University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA , Karno, Mitchell P. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences - University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA , Montoya, Amanda K. Department of Psychology - University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA , MacKillop, James Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences - McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada , Lim, Aaron C. Department of Psychology - University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA , Ray, Lara A. Department of Psychology - University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA

  • Pages
    12
  • From page
    1
  • To page
    12
  • Abstract
    Background Findings have been mixed as to whether brief intervention (BI) is appropriate and effective for individuals with more severe alcohol use problems. Motivation to change drinking has been supported as a mechanism of behavior change for BI. This exploratory study examined aspects of motivation as mechanisms of clinical response to BI and alcohol problem severity as a moderator of treatment effects. Methods Non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers (average age = 35 years; 57% male) were randomized to receive BI (n = 27) or attention-matched control (n = 24). Three indices of motivation to change were assessed at baseline and post-intervention: importance, confidence, and readiness. Moderated mediation analyses were implemented with treatment condition as the focal predictor, changes in motivation as mediator, 1-month follow-up drinks per day as the outcome, and an alcohol severity factor as second-stage moderator. Results Analysis of importance displayed a significant effect of intervention condition on importance (p < 0.003) and yielded a significant index of moderated mediation (CI − 0.79, − 0.02), indicating that the conditional indirect effect of treatment condition on drinking through importance was stronger for those with higher alcohol severity. For all motivation indices, alcohol severity moderated the effect of post-intervention motivation levels on drinking (p’s < 0.05). The direct effect of treatment condition on drinking was not significant in any model. Conclusions Findings highlight the relevance of considering one’s degree of alcohol problem severity in BI and alcohol screening efforts among non-treatment seeking heavy drinkers. These nuanced effects elucidate both potential mechanisms and moderators of BI response. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04710095. Registered January 14, 2021—retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04710095.
  • Farsi abstract
    فاقد چكيده فارسي
  • Keywords
    Brief intervention , Alcohol , Problem severity , Motivation to change
  • Journal title
    Addiction Science and Clinical Practice
  • Serial Year
    2021
  • Record number

    2623442