Title of article :
Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams
Author/Authors :
Bank, Lindsay Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences - Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary Research - VU University - Amsterdam, the Netherlands , Scheele, Fedde Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences - Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary Research - VU University - Amsterdam, the Netherlands , Jippes, Mariëlle Department of Plastic Surgery - Erasmus Medical Centre - Rotterdam, the Netherlands , Leppink, Jimmie Faculty of Health - Medicine and Life Sciences - School of Health Professions Education - Maastricht University - Maastricht, the Netherlands , Scherpbier, Albert JJA Faculty of Health - Medicine and Life Sciences - School of Health Professions Education - Maastricht University - Maastricht, the Netherlands , Rooyen, Corry den Movation BV - Maarssen, the Netherlands , Luijk, Scheltus J van Department of Healthcare Education - Maastricht University Medical Center+ - Maastricht, the Netherlands
Abstract :
Curriculum change and innovation are inevitable parts of progress in postgraduate medical education (PGME). Although implementing change is known to be challenging, change management principles are rarely looked at for support. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for the successful implementation of change initiatives. Therefore, this study explores whether assessing ORC in clinical teaching teams could help to understand how curriculum change takes place in PGME.
Methods
Clinical teaching teams in hospitals in the Netherlands were requested to complete the Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change, a questionnaire to measure ORC in clinical teaching teams. In addition, change-related behavior was measured by using the “behavioral support-for-change” measure. A two-way analysis of variance was performed for all response variables of interest.
Results
In total, 836 clinical teaching team members were included in this study: 288 (34.4%) trainees, 307 (36.7%) clinical staff members, and 241 (28.8%) program directors. Overall, items regarding whether the program director has the authority to lead scored higher compared with the other items. At the other end, the subscales “management support and leadership,” “project resources,” and “implementation plan” had the lowest scores in all groups.
Discussion
The study brought to light that program directors are clearly in the lead when it comes to the implementation of educational innovation. Clinical teaching teams tend to work together as a team, sharing responsibilities in the implementation process. However, the results also reinforce the need for change management support in change processes in PGME.
Keywords :
questionnaire innovation , organizational readiness for change , postgraduate medical education , curriculum change , change management
Journal title :
Advances in Medical Education and Practice