• Title of article

    Team-based learning: assessing the impact on anatomy teaching in People’s Republic of China

  • Author/Authors

    Yan, Junhao Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Liu, E Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Zhang, Yixuan Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Luan, Yingjie Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Qin, Lihua Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Zhou, Changman Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Zhang, Weiguang Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Ding, Xinling Medical College - Neimenggu, People’s Republic of China , Xiong, Lili School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine - Sichuan University - Chengdu, People’s Republic of China

  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    589
  • To page
    594
  • Abstract
    In this study, the effects of team-based learning (TBL) method on the anatomy course for students in People’s Republic of China were assessed. Methods The students were randomly divided into the traditional lecture-based teaching group (traditional learning [TL] group, 99 students) and TBL teaching group (98 students). The TBL method required the students to prepare the assigned content in advance and discuss some specific topics in small groups. The test scores and questionnaire were applied to evaluate the effects of the two methods. Results The students in TBL group had higher examination scores (81.70±8.53 vs 74.41±8.27, F[1,195] =124.6, p<0.01). The ratios of students with excellent (13.27% vs 9.09%, χ2[1] =4.00, p=0.041) and good scores (25.51% vs 16.16%, χ2[1] =4.85, p=0.027) were markedly increased in the TBL than the TL group, and the ratio of students who had just managed to pass was decreased (17.34% vs 32.33% in TL group, χ2[1] =5.91, p=0.015). The students in TBL group significantly achieved some improvement in mutual communication ability (χ2[1] =7.54, p=0.006), expression ability (χ2[1] =4.930, p=0.026), generalization capacity (χ2[1] =4.08, p=0.043), cooperative ability cultivation (χ2[1] =5.04, p=0.024), knowledge extension (χ2[1] =4.50, p=0.034), and enthusiasm mobilization (χ2[1] =4.27, p=0.039). Conclusion TBL could improve not only the test scores of the students, but also their study enthusiasm, initiative learning ability, communication ability, and team awareness.
  • Keywords
    team-based learning , lecture-based learning , student , anatomy
  • Journal title
    Advances in Medical Education and Practice
  • Serial Year
    2018
  • Record number

    2624796