Author/Authors :
AKAN, Burak Ufuk University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turkey , YILDIRIM, Tuğrul Ufuk University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turkey , GÜÇLÜ, Berk Ufuk University - Faculty of Medicine - Departments of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turkey , KAYA, Alper Ufuk University - Faculty of Medicine - Departments of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turkey , KARAGÜVEN, Doğaç Ufuk University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turkey , ÇETİN, İlker Ufuk University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turkey
Abstract :
Objective: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to describe the outcomes of total knee replacement (TKR) after failed Oxford phase 3 medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Methods: The study included 24 revision TKRs (20 females, 4 males; mean age: 61 years) performed following failed aseptic UKR. Outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Results: The most common causes for revision were mobile bearing dislocation and unexplained pain. Mean preoperative KSS was 50.3 (range: 37 to 66) and 82.2 (range: 58 to 97) after TKR. There were 17 excellent, 4 good, 2 fair and 1 poor results. Conclusion: The type of UKR performed (cemented versus uncemented) had no effect on TKR success. Revision for failed UKR with TKR appears to be a technically straightforward procedure with satisfactory early clinical results.
Keywords :
Knee , osteoarthritis , revision surgery , total knee replacement , unicompartmental knee replacement
