Author/Authors :
Murray, Nigel P Faculty of Medicine - University Finis Terrae, Santiago - 7501015, Chile - Urology Service - Hospital de Carabineros - Santiago 7770199, Chile , Aedo, Socrates Faculty of Medicine - University Finis Terrae, Santiago - 7501015, Chile , Fuentealba, Cynthia Urology Service - Hospital de Carabineros - Santiago 7770199, Chile , Reyes, Eduardo Faculty of Medicine - University Diego Portales - Santiago - 8370179, Chile - Urology Service - Hospital DIPRECA - Santiago - 7601003, Chile , Salazar, Anibal Urology Service - Hospital de Carabineros - Santiago 7770199, Chile , Antonio Lopez, Marco Faculty of Medicine - University Mayor - Santiago - 7510041, Chile , Minzer, Simona Faculty of Medicine - University de los Andes - Santiago, Chile , Orrego, Shenda Faculty of Medicine - University Mayor - Santiago - 7510041, Chile , Guzman, Eghon Faculty of Medicine - University Mayor - Santiago - 7510041, Chile
Abstract :
Purpose: To compare Gleason score (GS), pathological stage, minimal residual disease (MRD) and outcome after prostatectomy radical for prostate cancer.
Patients and Methods: 290/357 men with GS 6 or 7 and pT2 or pT3a disease treated with radical prostatectomy participated. Blood and bone marrow were obtained one month after surgery. Circulating prostate cells (CPCs) were detected using differential gel centrifugation and immunocytochemistry with anti PSA, micro-metastasis
weas detected using immunocytochemistry with anti-PSA. Biochemical failure free survival (BFFS) and restricted
mean survival times (RMST) were calculated according to GS and stage. MRD was classified as negative, patients
only positive for micro-metastasis and patients positive for CPCs; BFFS and RMST were calculated according to
MRD sub-type.
Results: GS7 (HR 3.03) and pT3a (HR 3.68) cancers were associated with a higher failure rate, shorter time to failure
and associated with CPC positive MRD (p < 0.001), while G6 and pT2 with MRD negative disease (p<0.001).
Men with CPC (+) MRD were at high risk of early treatment failure; 15% BFFS at 10 years, RMST 3.0 years. Men
positive for only micro-metastasis were at risk of late failure, 50% BFFS at 10 years, RMST 8.0 years compared
with MRD negative patients; 80% BFFS at 10 years, RMST 9.0 years.
Conclusion: The sub-type of MRD identifies Gleason 6 pT2 patients with a poor prognosis and Gleason 7 pT3a patients with a good prognosis and could be used to classify men according to personal risk characteristics for the use of adjuvant treatment.
Keywords :
biochemical failure , circulating prostate cells , micro-metastasis , minimal residual disease , prostate cancer