Title of article
Mean Values after Treatment or Mean Difference?
Author/Authors
Amani, Behnam Department of Health Sciences Education Development - School of Public Health - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Akbarzadeh, Arash Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics - School of Public Health - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Amani, Bahman Department of Health Sciences Education Development - School of Public Health - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran
Pages
1
From page
324
To page
324
Abstract
In a systematic review and meta-analysis Published in the Urology(1) entitled “Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” by Libo and Guizhong in 2017, the authors in methods section state that “weighted mean difference (MD) was used for continuous variables in their meta-analysis”. While, the authors used the endpoint scores as the mean difference in each group regardless of the baseline scores and one study(2) that baseline used as mean difference
Based on statistical literature in meta-analysis, the “mean difference” is change average from baseline to endpoint. So, to calculate the mean difference, we should use endpoint minus baseline mean score(3).
In our understanding, , it seems that the result of Libo’s meta-analysis(1) should revise for the mean difference as mentioned above.
Keywords
Mean Values , Treatment , Mean Difference , meta-analysis
Journal title
Urology Journal
Serial Year
2020
Record number
2639385
Link To Document