Title of article :
Hydatid Cyst Treatment and Management in Retroperitoneal Organs; Is Percutaneous Drainage an Option?
Author/Authors :
Emre Göger, Yunus Department of Urology - Meram Medical Faculty - Necmettin Erbakan University - Konya, Turkey , Serkan Özkent, Mehmet Department of Urology - Konya Education and Research Hospital - Health Sciences University - Konya, Turkey , Aykut Yıldırım, Mehmet Department of General Surgery - Meram Medical Faculty - Necmettin Erbakan University - Konya, Turkey , Bakdık, Suleyman Department of Radiology - Meram Medical Faculty - Necmettin Erbakan University - Konya, Turkey , Giray Sönmez, Mehmet Department of Urology - Meram Medical Faculty - Necmettin Erbakan University - Konya, Turkey , Kadıyoran, Cengiz Department of Radiology - Meram Medical Faculty - Necmettin Erbakan University - Konya, Turkey , Balasar, Mehmet Department of Urology - Meram Medical Faculty - Necmettin Erbakan University - Konya, Turkey , Çakır, Murat Department of General Surgery - Meram Medical Faculty - Necmettin Erbakan University - Konya, Turkey
Pages :
7
From page :
657
To page :
663
Abstract :
Purpose: To evaluate patients who had hydatid cyst (CH) in their retroperitoneal space and organs in order to determine a standard treatment option for CH. Materials and Methods: The files of 56 patients who were treated for CH in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent either percutaneous drainage (PD) or surgery. Patients were divided into two groups as PD (Group one) and surgery groups (Group two). Preoperative and postoperative results were compared statistically. Results: 31 of 56 patients were male. Mean age of the patient was 39.7 (10–85). 16 patients had been treated with PD and 40 with different surgical interventions such as total cystectomy, partial cystectomy, partial nephrectomy, total nephrectomy, surrenalectomy, and laparoscopic partial surrenalectomy. Patients’ followed up was 18 months (6-38m). Relapse was seen in 1 patient who underwent PD. On comparing the results, hospitalization period was prolonged in the surgical group with enlarged cyst presence. Conclusion: CH presence in the retroperitoneal area is rare. PD, a minimally invasive method, has the potential to be the standard treatment option as it can be performed safely in selected patients. However, currently surgical treatment is considered as the first treatment option after CH diagnosis.
Keywords :
hydatid cyst , percutaneous drainage , retroperitoneal-placed cyst hydatid , treatment of hydatid cyst disease , minimally invasive surgery
Journal title :
Urology Journal
Serial Year :
2020
Record number :
2645167
Link To Document :
بازگشت