Title of article
The Meaning of a Valid Consent to Medical Treatment in Malaysia: Tan Ah Kau V Government of Malaysia Revisited
Author/Authors
Tengku Zainudin, Tengku Noor Azira Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia - Faculty of Law, Malaysia , Che Ngah, Anisah Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia - Faculty of Law, Malaysia , Abdul Rahim, Anita Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia - Faculty of Law, Malaysia , Mohd Shariff, Ahmad ‘Azam Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia - Faculty of Law, Malaysia
From page
35
To page
42
Abstract
A doctor can treat his patient only when a consent is deemed legally valid under the eyes of the law. A valid consent justifies any medical treatment or procedure that a patient requires. Since most treatment will usually involves some kind of physical contact between a doctor and his patient, any medical treatment given without first obtaining a valid consent can tantamount to a battery under the law of torts in Malaysia. However, medical cases relating to the issue of consent have always been decided by the courts in this country under the spectrum of the law of medical negligence as opposed to the law of trespass, specifically, battery. Consequently, there exists a need to determine what is actually meant by a valid consent in law. This determination is crucial as it will enable the aggrieved party to choose the most appropriate cause of action to be taken when the validity of consent given is being challenged
Keywords
Consent , battery , negligence , medical treatment
Journal title
Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (JSSH)
Journal title
Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (JSSH)
Record number
2651228
Link To Document