• Title of article

    Evaluation of quality and patient satisfaction during endoscopic procedure: A cross sectional study from South Asian country

  • Author/Authors

    Rasool, Shahid Aga Khan University Hospital - Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Pakistan , Ahmed, Shahid Aga Khan University Hospital - Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Pakistan , Siddiqui, Shaheer Aga Khan University Hospital - Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Pakistan , Salih, Mohammad Aga Khan University Hospital - Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Pakistan , Jafri, Wasim Aga Khan University Hospital - Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Pakistan , Hamid, Saeed Aga Khan University Hospital - Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Pakistan

  • From page
    990
  • To page
    995
  • Abstract
    Objective: To assess the quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures and patient satisfaction in endoscopy suite of South Asian country. Methods: Patients coming to the endoscopic suite of Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) were interviewed and assessed in this cross-sectional study. Quality of GI endoscopic procedures was evaluated using assessment tools as suggested by The American Society of Gastroenterology. Patient satisfaction after the procedure was assessed using a modified GHAA-9 questionnaire. The questionnaire was statistically evaluated using Pareto analysis and Spearman rank correlation. Results: In this study, 323 patients were evaluated with a mean age of 43±14.36 years. Out of all the procedures 251(77.7%) were gastroscopies while 72(22.3%) were colonoscopies. Patients undergoing different therapeautic procedures were 121 in number (37.46%). Pre-procedure education was rated as excellent or very good by 91.3% of the patients. Midazolam was used for sedation with an average dose of 3 mg. Technically successful procedures included 99.2% gastroscopies and 98.6% colonoscopies. Mean score of patients regarding satisfaction on mGHAA-9 questionnaire was 30 ± 3.965. Patient dissatisfaction calculated in our study was 3.6% with the length of time spent waiting before procedure and length of time waiting to get an appointment for the procedure contributing to 90% of dissatisfaction. Conclusions: Quality of endoscopic procedures at our centre is at par with international standards with acceptable complication rate and good patient satisfaction.
  • Journal title
    Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association (Centre) JPMA
  • Journal title
    Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association (Centre) JPMA
  • Record number

    2655267