Title of article
AN ANALYSIS OF WAGNER BROWN, LTD., v. SHEPPARD
Author/Authors
Irdem, Lalenur Turkish Petroleum Corporation - LL M, Turkey
From page
127
To page
146
Abstract
Oil and gas leases are one of the main granting instruments used in the oil industry. The “contract and conveyance” nature of these leases can make certain clauses challenging to interpret. In Wagner Brown, Ltd. v. Sheppard, the main discussion focuses on a pooling clause, specifically the legal nature of that clause and the rights conveyed from lessor to lessee through such pooling. After providing a detailed analysis of Wagner and Brown with regard to the jurisdiction in which it was decided, this article applies that lens to the examination and comparison of the Turkish legislature’s treatment of pooling. This leads to the Texas Supreme Court’s decision being called into question based on its arbitrary interpretation of fundamental property law principals.
Keywords
Oil and gas lease , pooling , unitization , fee simple , fee simple determinable , possibility of reverter , agency , power coupled with an interest.
Journal title
Ankara Law Review
Journal title
Ankara Law Review
Record number
2675990
Link To Document