Author/Authors :
Norouzi Masir, Raziye Faculty of Mining Engineering - Petroleum and Geophysics - Shahrood University of Technology - Shahrood, Iran , Ataei, Mohammad Faculty of Mining Engineering - Petroleum and Geophysics - Shahrood University of Technology - Shahrood, Iran , Motahedi, Adel Faculty of Mining Engineering - Petroleum and Geophysics - Shahrood University of Technology - Shahrood, Iran
Abstract :
The drilling and blasting method is the first choice for rock breakage in surface or
underground mines due to its high flexibility against variations and low investment
costs. However, any method has its own advantages and disadvantages. The flyrock
phenomenon is one of the drilling and blasting disadvantages that the mining engineers
have always been faced with in the surface mine blasting operations. Flyrock may lead
to fatality and destroy mine equipment and structures, and so its risk assessment is very
essential. For a flyrock risk assessment, the causing events that lead to flyrock along
with their probabilities and severities should be identified. For this aim, a combination
of the fuzzy fault tree analysis and multi-criteria decision-making methods are used.
Based on the results obtained, the relevant causing events of flyrock in surface mines
can be categorized into three major groups: design error, human error, and natural
error. Finally, using the obtained probabilities and severities for these three groups, the
risk matrix is constructed. Based on the risk matrix, the risk numbers of flyrock
occurrence due to the design errors, human errors, and natural influence are 12, 6, and
2, respectively. Hence, in order to minimize the flyrock risk, it is very vital for the
engineers to select appropriate values for the design events of blasting pattern such as
burden, spacing, delays, and hole diameter.
Keywords :
Risk assessment , FFTA , Flyrock , Surface mines , MCDM