Title of article :
Do we need a femoral artery route for transvenous PDA closure in children with ADO-I?
Author/Authors :
Baykan, Ali Erciyes University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Peadiatric Cardiology, Turkey , Narin, Nazmi Erciyes University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Turkey , Özyurt, Abdullah Erciyes Univesity - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Turkey , Argun, Mustafa Erciyes Univesity - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Turkey , Pamukçu, Özge Erciyes Univesity - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Turkey , Onan, Sertaç H. Erciyes University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Peadiatric Cardiology, Turkey , Sezer, Sadettin Erciyes University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatrics, TURKEY , Baykan, Zeynep Erciyes University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Medical Education, Turkey , Üzüm, Kazım Erciyes University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Turkey
From page :
242
To page :
247
Abstract :
Objective: The standard procedure in percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with Amplatzer duct occluder-I (ADO-I) is transvenous closure guided by aortic access through femoral artery. The current study aims to compare the procedures for PDA closure with ADOI: only transvenous access with the standard procedure. Methods: This study was designed retrospectively and 101 pediatric patients were included. PDA closure was done by only femoral venous access in 19 of them (group 1), arterial and venous access used in 92 patients (group 2) between 2004 to 2012 years. The position of the device and residual shunt in group1 was evaluated by the guidance of the aortogram obtained during the return phase of the pulmonary artery injection and guidance of transthoracic echocardiography. Shapiro-Wilk s test, Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared tests were used for statistical comparison. Results: The procedure was successful in 18 (95%) patients in group 1 and 90 (98%) patients in group 2. Complications including the pulmonary artery embolization (n=1), protrusion to pulmonary artery (n=1), inguinal hematoma (n=3), bleeding (n=2) were only detected in group 2. In other words, while complications were observed in 7 (7.2%) patients in group 2, no minor/major complication was observed in group 1. Complete closure in group 1 was: in catheterization room 14 (77.8%), at 24th hour in 2 (11.1%), at first month in 2 (11.1%). Complete closure in group 2 was: 66 (73.4%) patients in the catheterization room, 21 (23.3%) at 24th hour, 3 (3.3%) at first month, complete closure occurred at the end of first month. Conclusion: In percutaneouse PDA closure via ADO-I, this technique can be a choice for patients whose femoral artery could not be accessed, or access is impossible/contraindicated. But for the reliability and validity of this method, randomized multicenter clinical studies are necessary.
Keywords :
amplatzer device , children , echocardiography , patent ductus arteriosus , transcatheter closure , transvenous
Journal title :
The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology: Andolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi
Journal title :
The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology: Andolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi
Record number :
2693210
Link To Document :
بازگشت