Does the Type of Resuscitative Fluid Affect Healing of Colonic Anastomosis in Experimentally Induced Hemorrhagic Shock in Rats?

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of different resuscitative fluids on the healing of intestinal anastomosis in a hemorrhagic-shock rat model. Materials and Methods: Closed-colony Wistar male rats (n = 40; 8 rats per group) were subjected to volume-controlled hemorrhagicshock, followed by a 30-min shock phase. The animals were then resuscitated with one of the following fluids (which also corresponds to their respective groups): lactated Ringer’s solution (LR), hydroxyethyl starch (HES), 7.5% hypertonic saline (HS) and autologous blood (AB). There was also a control group (CL), which did not experience hemorrhagic shock or receive any resuscitative fluids. All rats underwentlaparotomy, segmental resection and anastomosis of the left colon. Five days later, a 2nd laparotomy was performed and the anastomotic bursting pressure was measured in vivo. Thereafter, the anastomosed segment was resected to measure the tissue hydroxyproline level and the grade of anastomotic fibrosis. Results: All experimental groups (LR, HES, HS and AB) exhibited lower anastomotic bursting pressures than the CL group; however, nointergroup differences achieved statistical significance. The mean tissue hydroxyproline level and fibrosis grade also were similar across all 5 groups. Conclusion: In traumatic hemorrhagic shock, anastomosis safety does not appear to be affected by the type of fluid used for resuscitation. Moreover, LR, HES and HS all seemed to reinforce healing as effectively as transfused blood.