Title of article :
Pulmonary Thromboembolism in Patients After COVID-19: Predictive Indicators for Correct Diagnosis
Author/Authors :
Yakova-Hristova, Dilyana Heart and Brain Centre of Excellence - University Hospital, Pleven, Bulgaria , Simova, Iana Heart and Brain Centre of Excellence - University Hospital, Pleven, Bulgaria , Pavlov, Pavlin Heart and Brain Centre of Excellence - University Hospital, Pleven, Bulgaria , Hristov, Martin Cardiology Hospital, Pleven, Bulgaria , Kundurzhiev, Todor Faculty of Public Health - Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria
Abstract :
Background: Infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 can lead to significant procoagulant events, sometimes involving life-threatening pulmonary
thromboembolism (PE). Additional conditions complicating the diagnosis are the presence of risk factors for PE in almost
all patients with COVID-19 and the overlap of clinical presentation between PE and COVID-19.
Objectives:We conducted a single-center study at the Heart and Brain Hospital, Pleven, from December 2020 to February 2021. It included
27 consecutively hospitalized patients with recent pneumonia caused by COVID-19 and clinical presentations corresponding
to PE.
Methods: The cohort was divided into two groups with and without a definitive diagnosis of PE, proven by CT pulmoangiography.
The aim was to find the indicators predicting the presence of PE in patients with acute or post-acute COVID-19 conditions.
Results: Our results showed that some ECG criteria, including S-wave over 1.5mmin leads I and aVL (P = 0.007), Q-wave in leads III
and aVF (P = 0.020), and D-dimer as a quantitative variable (P = 0.025), were independent predictors of PE. The RV/LV diameter ratios
1.0 and right ventricular dysfunction showed a sensitivity (Se) of 62.5%, specificity (Sp) of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of
100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.4% to verify the PE diagnosis. Besides, the D-dimer cutoff value of 1,032 ng/mL had an
optimal Se of 87.5%, Sp of 57.9%, PPV of 46.7%, and NPV of 91.7% for PE diagnosis (P = 0.021).
Conclusions: Against the background of acute and post-acute COVID-19 conditions, ECG and EchoCG criteria remain the PE predictors.
We suggest that a higher D-dimer cutoff value be applied in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 patients to confirm/dismiss PE
diagnosis.
Keywords :
Infection , COVID-19 , Pulmonary Thromboembolism , D-dimer
Journal title :
Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases