synchronization of prosecutors to the implementation of work training as institution of criminal fine for children in decision of state court number 30 / pid.sus-children / 2016 / pn

the purpose of writing this article is to synchronize prosecutors arrangements for the implementation of job training as a substitute for criminal fines for children in the bangil district court decision number 30 / pid.sus-anak / 2016 / pn.bil. the study method uses a statutory approach (statue approach), a case approach. children are an inseparable part of the sustainability of human life and the sustainability of a nation and state. the presence of law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the criminal justice system for children (uu sppa) as a substitute for law no. 3 of 1997 concerning juvenile courts (uupa), one of the substances that is regulated is the placement of children who undergo a judicial process to be placed in the special development institution for children (lpka). bangil court decision number 30 / pid.sus-anak / 2016 / pn.bil, that is, there has been a criminal act of intercourse against a minor in pasuruan regency which was committed by the defendant, namely a child who was still a minor. in the letter of the public prosecutor s demands at the pasuruan district district attorney, it states that imposing a sentence against the defendant with imprisonment of 04 (four) years is reduced as long as the defendant is in detention on the order of the defendant to remain in detention, and fines that are not paid are replaced with job training at a vocational training center. pasuruan for 03 (three) months. whereas in the decision of the bangil district court number 30 / pid.sus-anak / 2016 / pn.bil, namely imposing a sentence against the defendant with imprisonment of 02 (two) years and 02 (two) months, and fines that are not paid are mandatory job training at the vocational training center for 01 (one) month.