Author/Authors :
MAHABAMUNUGE, JASMIN New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , MOREL, KAYLA New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , BUDROW, JOHN New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , TOUNKEL, INNES New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , HART, CASSIDY New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , BRISKIN, CAMILLE New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , KASOFF, MADISON New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , SPIEGEL, SARAH New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , RISUCCI, DONALD New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA , KOESTLER, JENNIFER New York Medical College - Department of Medical Education - School of Medicine - Valhalla, NY, USA
Abstract :
Introduction: Medical students self-report insufficient training in topics of gender and sexuality in medicine, which may ultimately
lead to negative health outcomes in patients for whom they will
provide care. This study aims to identify whether a studentinitiated
lecture series on topics related to gender and sexual
health leads to greater student comfort with discussing topics
related to diverse sexual content.
Methods: Medical students matriculated during two consecutive
academic years were invited to participate in the lecture series.
Investigators administered anonymous pre- and post-series
surveys (n=152 and 105 respondents, respectively) using google
forms. Respondents rated their comfort levels discussing relevant
topics and provided narrative feedback concerning strengths and
areas for improvement of the lecture series. Overlaps between the
95% confidence intervals around pre- and post-series percentage
of students comfortable/very comfortable discussing each topic
were examined to compare pre- vs post-series comfort ratings.
Narrative comments were reviewed for thematic feedback.
Results: 105 medical students completed the lecture series, with
80% identifying as female. Self-assessed comfort levels across
all seminar topics were greater in post- versus pre-lecture series
surveys with the following topics showing the biggest differences
(percentage of students “somewhat” or “very” comfortable [95%
confidence intervals]: discussing sexuality with gender (68%[59-
77] vs. 29%[22-36]) and sexual minority patients (84%[77-91] vs.
49%[41-57]), HIV prevention counseling (70%[61-78] vs. 20%[20-
34]), identifying female genital cutting (44%[34-53] vs. 11%[6-
16]), and discussing intimate partner violence (65%[55-74] vs.
33%[25-40]). Qualitative analysis indicated respondents found
the lectures to be effective and believed they should be integrated
into the required medical school curriculum.
Conclusion: Our student-initiated lecture series was associated
with greater student comfort discussing topics related to gender
and sexuality with patients. This framework represents a useful
method to address gaps in medical education and has the potential to improve health outcomes in multiple populations.
Keywords :
Medical students , Curriculum , Gender and sexual minorities , Sexual health , Sexuality , Gender identity