Author/Authors :
Farzaneh, Abdollah Department of Optometry - Rehabilitation Research Center - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Riazi, Abbas Department of Optometry - Rehabilitation Research Center - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ghasemi Falavarjani, Khalil Eye Research Center - The Five Senses Institute - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Doostdar, Asgar Department of Optometry - Rehabilitation Research Center - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Kamali, Mohammad Department of Physiotherapy - Rehabilitation Research Center - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Sedaghat, Ahad Eye Research Center - The Five Senses Institute - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Department of Basic Sciences - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Purpose: To evaluate reading performance in different preferred retinal loci (PRLs) using a Persian version of a Minnesota Low Vision Reading (MNREAD) chart in Persian‑speaking patients with age‑related macular degeneration (AMD).
Methods: In this cross‑sectional study, 35 patients with AMD were assessed. The reading performance was investigated by the MNREAD
chart without using low vision aids. The location of PRL was determined monocularly using an MP1 microperimeter (Nidek Technologies,
Padua, Italy). The anatomical location of the fovea was determined using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Images were taken with the
MP1 microperimeter, and Spectralis HRA‑OCT device was processed using graphic software to determine the location of the PRL on the retina.
Results: Thirty‑five patients (51 eyes) with a mean age of 73.8 ± 7.7 years (range, 54–88 years) were assessed. Mean best corrected distance
visual acuity (logMAR) was 0.65 ± 0.35 (range, 0.2–1.3). Mean levels of reading acuity (RA) (P = 0.009) and critical print size (CPS) (P = 0.015)
were significantly different in different locations of PRL. Average scores of maximum reading speed (MRS) (P = 0.058) and reading accessibility
index (ACC) (P = 0.058) were not statistically significant in different locations of PRL. There was a positive correlation between PRL‑fovea
distance and RA (P ˂ 0.001, r = 0.591) and CPS (P ˂ 0.001, r = 0.614). Significant negative correlations were observed between PRL‑fovea
distance and MRS (P ˂ 0.001, r = −0.519) and ACC (P ˂ 0.001, r = −0.545).
Conclusions: This study provides evidence for differences in the reading performance of Persian‑speaking patients with AMD in different
PRL locations. The average scores of all reading indices obtained in the right‑field PRL are lower than those in other areas and are highly correlated with the PRL‑fovea distance.
Keywords :
Age‑related macular degeneration , Microperimetry , Minnesota low vision reading chart , Preferred retinal locus , Reading characteristics