Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Phacoemulsification: Combined versus Sequential Surgery

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) combined with phacoemulsification versus DMEK following phacoemulsification. Methods: In this interventional retrospective comparative nonrandomized case series study, patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) with either cataract or previous cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were assigned to one of the two groups according to lens status. Group 1 included patients who had cataract and FECD and would undergo triple procedure (phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and DMEK), whereas Group 2 included patients who had FECD and had phacoemulsification with IOL implantation earlier and would undergo DMEK only as a sequential procedure. Results: Postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in both groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months revealed a statistically nonsignificant difference between the two groups with mean logMAR BCVA at 6 months of 0.07 ± 0.18 and 0.07 ± 0.19 in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P > 0.05). The drop in endothelial cell density by the end of the 6th postoperative month was by 39.44% ±7.92 and 38.73% ±8.10 in the triple‑procedure group and DMEK only group, respectively (P = 0.005). Total postoperative complications rate and the rebubbling rate were statistically similar between both groups with 13.5% and 12.5% rebubbling rate in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Visual outcomes, endothelial cell loss, and rebubbling rate are comparable when DMEK is combined with phacoemulsification or when it is performed as staged procedure, without statistically significant difference in the outcomes.