Author/Authors :
Aghayan, S Periodontology Dept - Faculty of Dentistry - Tehran Medical Science - Islamic Azad University - Tehran, Iran , Rokhshad, R Faculty of Dentistry - Tehran Medical Sciences - Islamic Azad University - Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/
CAM) has been widely used in implant dentistry. Recent computer-guided dynamic
navigation systems promise an accurate approach to minimally invasive implant placement.
Robot-assisted surgery has been used in dentistry since 2017. The present study
aims to review the properties, clinical outcomes, advantages, and limitations of navigation,
robotics, and CAD/CAM in implant placement surgery.
Materials and Methods: An electronic search of the literature was conducted mainly
through PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases.
Studies in the English language were considered for inclusion if they evaluated robotics,
CAD/CAM, and navigation in implant placement. Finally, 21 articles were selected.
Results: Guided implant surgery is assumed accurate, precise, and reliable; it also has
a lower complication rate compared to freehanded implant surgery. Surgical guides
could be indicated for patients with limited mouth opening, tight interdental spaces,
a strong gag reflex, and distal implants. Several studies have reported that computerassisted
surgery improves the accuracy of implant placement. Expensive equipment,
high costs, and gaps between the guides and drill bite are the disadvantages of digital
implant placement.
Conclusion: Computer-aided implant navigation systems can improve implant placement
outcomes. Digital procedures have shown accurate outcomes in implant surgery.
Despite the advantages of guided surgery, deviation of implant position from the
planned position still occurs. However, improvements in digital dentistry are slowly
overcoming these challenges.
Keywords :
Surgical Procedures , Dental Implants , Clinical Outcomes , Computer-Assisted Surgery , Robotics