Title of article :
Electroencephalography‐Based Brain–Computer Interface Motor Imagery Classification
Author/Authors :
Mohammadi, Ehsan ) Medical Image and Signal Processing Research Centre - School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Ghaderi Daneshmand, Parisa Department of Biomedical Engineering - School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Moosavi Khorzooghi, Mohammad Sadegh Department of Computer Science and Engineering - University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA
Abstract :
Background: Advances in the medical applications of brain–computer interface, like the motor
imagery systems, are highly contributed to making the disabled live better. One of the challenges with
such systems is to achieve high classification accuracy. Methods: A highly accurate classification
algorithm with low computational complexity is proposed here to classify different motor imageries
and execution tasks. An experimental study is performed on two electroencephalography datasets
(Iranian Brain–Computer Interface competition [iBCIC] dataset and the world BCI Competition IV
dataset 2a) to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. For lower complexity, the common
spatial pattern is applied to decrease the 64 channel signal to four components, in addition to increase
the class separability. From these components, first, some features are extracted in the time and time–
frequency domains, and next, the best linear combination of these is selected by adopting the stepwise
linear discriminant analysis (LDA) method, which are then applied in training and testing the classifiers
including LDA, random forest, support vector machine, and K nearest neighbors. The classification
strategy is of majority voting among the results of the binary classifiers. Results: The experimental
results indicate that the proposed algorithm accuracy is much higher than that of the winner of the
first iBCIC. As to dataset 2a of the world BCI competition IV, the obtained results for subjects 6 and
9 outperform their counterparts. Moreover, this algorithm yields a mean kappa value of 0.53, which
is higher than that of the second winner of the competition. Conclusion: The results indicate that this
method is able to classify motor imagery and execution tasks in both effective and automatic manners.
Keywords :
Brain–computer‐interface , electroencephalography , linear discriminant analysis , motor imagery , pattern recognition
Journal title :
Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors (JMSS)