Author/Authors :
Soraya, Shiva Spiritual Health Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Shabani, Amir Mood Disorder Research Group - Mental Health Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Kamalzadeh, Leila Mood Disorder Research Group - Mental Health Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Kashaninasab, Fatemeh Rasoul Akram Hospital - Department of Psychiatry - Faculty of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Rashedi, Vahid Faculty of Behavioral Science and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry) - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Saeidi, Mahdie Faculty of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Seddigh, Ruohollah Spiritual Health Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Asadi, Shabnam Faculty of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Multiple-choice questions are among the most common
written tests. This study aimed to evaluate the faculty members’ability
to determine and predict the level of difficulty and discrimination
coefficient of multiple-choice tests at Psychiatry Department.
Methods: All faculty members at Psychiatry Department of Iran
University of Medical Sciences participated in this study. The difficulty
and discrimination coefficient of all questions (150 questions) of the
mid-term exam of psychiatric residents were measured with both
software program and formulas by hand. Then, from each group
of questions with high, medium, and low difficulty coefficient,
10 questions (30 questions in total) were selected and provided to
faculty members for ranking each question in terms of difficulty and
discrimination coefficient. Finally, the correlation between faculty
members’ evaluation and standard results was measured by the
Spearman’s correlation. To calculate the discrimination coefficient, the
number of people who answered a question correctly in the low-score
group was subtracted from the high-score group and then the result was
divided by the number of people in a group.
Results: Twenty-five faculty members participated in this study.
There was a significant negative correlation between difficulty level
and discrimination coefficient in the whole group (r=-0.196, p=0.045),
but this was not the case in the upper and lower groups (r=-0.063,
p=0.733). In addition, the correlation between the discrimination
coefficient obtained from the formula and the average discrimination
coefficient of faculty members was not significant (r=-0.047, p=0.803).
Conclusion: It seems that the ability of faculty members to predict the
discrimination coefficient and difficulty level of questions is not sufficient.
Keywords :
Education , Educational measurements , Medical , Psychiatry , Reference standards