Title of article :
Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Sinensetin (Combination therapy) on Tumor Cells (Hela) and Normal Cells (CHO)
Author/Authors :
Javaheri, Behnam Department of Biology - Science and Research Branch - Islamic Azad University tehran branch, Tehran, Iran , Esmaeeli Djavid, Gholamreza Department of Photo Healing and Regeneration - Medical Laser Research Center - Yara Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran , Parivar, Kazem Department of Biology - Science and Research Branch - Islamic Azad University tehran branch, Tehran, Iran , Hekmat, Azadeh Department of Biology - Science and Research Branch - Islamic Azad University tehran branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Cervical and ovarian cancers are well-known causes of death among women in
developing countries. There are various technologies to treat cancer cells, but the polyphenolic
compound is a natural one and has an anti-cancer effect. Sinensetin is one of them and is found
in Orthosiphon stamineus and citrus fruits. Since combination therapy is more effective than drug
treatment alone, in this study, we investigated combination therapy using sinensetin and low-level
laser therapy (LLLT) to enhance treatment.
Methods: The cancer cells purchased from Pasteur Institute, Iran, were cultured.
The cells were treated with various concentrations of sinensetin (0.1-1-10-50,150 μg/mL for 24
hours), wavelengths of laser therapy (660 nm) and power density (3 J/cm2) for different times)30,
60, and 90 seconds) separately. Furthermore, sensitivity of cells to sinensetin, LLLT and combined
therapy was determined by clonogenic assays. To measure DNA damage and repair at individual
cell level used comet assay. To examine the intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species used
2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCFH) as an intracellular probe. To analyze data we used SPSS
software and comparison between groups was used (ANOVA) and t test statistical analyses were
performed using SPSS 17 software. Data are presented as means – standard error of mean. The level
of statistical significance was set at a two-tailed P value of 0.05. All tests were performed in triplicate.
Results: Our results demonstrated that the doubling time for CHO is more than Hella cells, with 20.7
and 27.7 h for each cell respectively. The pretreatments (first LLLT, then sinensetin) can decrease the
viability of both cell lines more than the first treatment (sinensetin + LLLT). In the clonogenic assay,
the pretreatment of cells with LLLT and Sinensetin significantly reduced the surviving fraction of both
cell lines. MTT results showed that pretreatment with LLLT and Sinensetin can increase cell death
compared to Sinensetin and LLLT alone. Production of ROS within the cell was enhanced with LLLT
+ sinensetin.
Conclusion: Our result indicated that combined therapy with LLLT and Sinensetin can treat CHO
and Hela cells better than the other groups. Combination treatment with sinensetin-LLLT and the
other treatment means, sinensetin and LLLT alone, did not change the cell viability significantly.
Keywords :
Sinensetin , Low-level laser irradiation (LLLT) , CHO , Hella , Anti-cancer effect , Combined therapy
Journal title :
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences