Title of article :
Effect of concentration of hydrofluoric acid and etching time on microtensile bond strength of Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics
Author/Authors :
Rostami ، Morteza Student Research Committee - Babol University of Medical Sciences , Mokhtarpour ، Faraneh Oral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute - Babol University of Medical Sciences , Alaghehmand ، Homayoon Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute - Babol University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Introduction: Etching the internal surface of ceramic restorations with hydrofluoric (HF) acid and silane is a well-accepted technique to enhance the bond strength. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of concentration of hydrofluoric acid and etching time on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramics in 2021. Materials Methods: This in vitro study was conducted on 8 Celtra-Duo ceramic blocks size 14 measuring 12×14×18 mm. Each ceramic block was divided into three equal pieces by a cutting machine to obtain a total of 24 specimens. The specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups for etching with 5% and 10% HF acid for 30, 60, and 120 seconds. Silane (Clearfil porcelain activator) and bonding agent (Clearfil SE Bond) were applied to the etched specimens. Panavia F2 resin cement was applied on the surfaces and light-cured. The μTBS of resin cement to porcelain was measured by a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope at x40 magnification. Data were analyzed by oneand two-way ANOVA (P 0.05). Results: The mean μTBS of Celtra-Duo ceramics subjected to etching for 30, 60, and 120 seconds was not significantly different in the use of 5% and 10% HF acid concentrations (P 0.05). Two-way ANOVA showed that the effects of HF acid concentration and etching time, and their interaction effect were not significant on μTBS of CAD/CAM Celtra-Duo ceramics (P 0.05). The mode of failure was dominantly adhesive in both concentrations of 5% and 10% HF acid. No mixed failure occurred in both concentrations. Conclusion: Considering the non-significant difference in μTBS of ceramics subjected to different concentrations of HF acid for different times, the application of HF acid with lower concentration for a shorter period is recommended to prevent possible adverse effects on ceramic strength.
Keywords :
Ceramics , Dentistry , Hydrofluoric Acid , Resin Cements
Journal title :
Caspian Journal of Dental Research
Journal title :
Caspian Journal of Dental Research