Title of article :
Evaluating the Ability of PRISM4 and PIM3 to PredictMortality in Patients Admitted to Pediatric IntensiveCareUnit; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Author/Authors :
Chegini, Victoria Department of Pediatrics - School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Hatamabadi, Hamidreza Department of Emergency Medicine - School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Jedari Attaran, Sima Department of Pediatrics - School of Medicine - Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran , Mahyar, Abolfazl Department of Pediatrics - School of Medicine - Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran , Mirzadeh, Monirsadat Department of Community Medicine - School of Medicine - Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran , Chegini, Venus Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - School of Medicine - Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Limited resources and the large number of children in need of services in the pediatric intensive
care unit (PICU) emphasize the need for effective allocation of resources for improving the outcome of at-risk
patients. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of PRISM4 and PIM3 systems in prediction
of in-hospital mortality of patients admitted to PICU.Methods: The present retrospective cross-sectional study
was a diagnostic accuracy study performed on patients admitted to PICU of Qods Hospital, Qazvin, Iran, during
one year. Scores of PRISM4 and PIM3 scales were calculated for each patient using the available calculators, and
the outcome of patients regarding in-hospital mortality was recorded. Finally, screening performance characteristics
of the mentioned scales in prediction of patients’ mortality were calculated and reported. Results: 218
patients with the mean age of 40.68 ± 37.92 (2-160) months were studied (57.8% female). There was a significant
direct correlation between PIM3 score and duration of stay in PICU (p < 0.0001; r = 0.259), need for inotropic
drug administration (p = 0.001), and mortality rate (p = 0.001). In addition, area under the receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve of PIM3 and PRISM4 in prediction of mortality among patients admitted to the PICU
was 0.939 (95%CI: 0.880 – 0.998) and 0.660 (95%CI: 0.371 – 0.950), respectively (p = 0.001). Based on the findings,
the best cut-off point for PIM3 scale in prediction of mortality was the score of 4 and it was estimated to be
the core of 8 for PRISM4 scale. Sensitivity and specificity of PIM3 scale in prediction of mortality in the cut-off
of 4 points were 100.00 (95% CI: 56.09- 100.00) and 81.51 (95% CI: 75.47- 86.38), respectively. These measures
were 42.85 (95%CI: 11.80- 79.76) and 98.10 (95%CI: 94.89- 99.39) for PRISM4 model, which indicates the higher
sensitivity of PIM3 system in this regard. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, the accuracy of
PIM3 is significantly higher than PRISM4 in prediction of in-hospital mortality among patients admitted to the
PICU. It seems that considering the 100%sensitivity of PIM3 in prediction of outcome, thismodel is a better tool
for screening patients who are at risk for in-hospital mortality in order to pay more attention and allocate more
resources to improve their outcome.
Keywords :
Intensive Care Units , Pediatric , Mortality , Clinical Decision Rules , Prognosis
Journal title :
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine (AAEM)