Author/Authors :
molero, b. université de toulouse - cesbio (centre d’études spatiales de la biosphère), Toulouse, France , leroux, d. j. cnrm (centre national de la recherche météorologique), Toulouse, France , richaume, p. université de toulouse - cesbio (centre d’études spatiales de la biosphère), Toulouse, France , kerr, y. h. université de toulouse - cesbio (centre d’études spatiales de la biosphère), Toulouse, France , merlin, o. université de toulouse - cesbio (centre d’études spatiales de la biosphère), Toulouse, France , cosh, m. h. usda-ars-hydrologyand remote sensing laboratory, Beltsville, USA , bindlish, r. nasa goddard space flight center, Greenbelt, USA
Abstract :
We conduct a novel comprehensive investigation that seeks to prove the connection between spatial scales and timescales in surface soil moisture (SM) within the satellite footprint (~50 km). Modeled and measured point series at Yanco and Little Washita in situ networks are first decomposed into anomalies at timescales ranging from 0.5 to 128 days, using wavelet transforms. Then, their degree of spatial representativeness is evaluated on a per-timescale basis by comparison to large spatial scale data sets (the in situ spatial average, SMOS, AMSR2, and ECMWF). Four methods are used for this: temporal stability analysis (TStab), triple collocation (TC), percentage of correlated areas (CArea), and a new proposed approach that uses wavelet-based correlations (WCor). We found that the mean of the spatial representativeness values tends to increase with the timescale but so does their dispersion. Locations exhibit poor spatial representativeness at scales below 4 days, while either very good or poor representativeness at seasonal scales. Regarding the methods, TStab cannot be applied to the anomaly series due to their multiple zerocrossings, and TC is suitable for week and month scales but not for other scales where data set crosscorrelations are found low. In contrast, WCor and CArea give consistent results at all timescales. WCor is less sensitive to the spatial sampling density, so it is a robust method that can be applied to sparse networks (one station per footprint). These results are promising to improve the validation and downscaling of satellite SM series and the optimization of SM networks.