Author/Authors :
Samimian, Sedigheh Clinical Research Development Unit of Poursina Hospital - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Ashrafi, Sadra Chronic Kidney Disease Research Center(CKDRC) - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Khaleghdoost Mohammadi, Tahereh Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing - Shahid Beheshti Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Yeganeh, Mohammad Reza Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing - Shahid Beheshti Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Ashraf, Ali Clinical Research Development Unit of Poursina Hospital - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Hakimi, Hamideh Department of Nursing - Islamic Azad University Lahijan Branch, Lahijan, Iran , Dehghani, Maryam Nahavand School of Allied Medical Sciences - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: The recommended position for measuring Intra-Abdominal Pressure (IAP) is the supine position.
However, patients put in this position are prone to Ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study was done to
evaluate the relationship between bed head angle and IAP measurements of intubated patients in the intensive
care unit. Methods: In this clinical trial, seventy-six critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation were enrolled.
IAP measurement was performed every 8 hours for 24 hours using the KORN method in three different
degrees of the head of bed (HOB) elevation (0±, 15± , and 30±). Bland-Altman analysis was performed to identify
the bias and limits of agreement among the three HOBs. According to World Society of the Abdominal Compartment
Syndrome (WSACS), we can consider two IAP techniques equivalent if a bias of <1 mmHg and limits
of agreement of - 4 to +4 were found between them. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software (v. 19),
and the significance level was considered as 0.05. Results: The prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension was
18.42%. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) of IAP were 8.44 ± 4.02 mmHg for HOB angle 0±, 9.58 ± 4.52 for HOB
angle 15±, and 11.10 ± 4.73 forHOB angle 30o (p = 0.0001). The IAPmeasurement bias between HOB angle 0±and
HOB angle 15± was 1.13 mmHg. This bias was 2.66 mmHg between HOB angle 0± and HOB angle 30±. Conclusion:
Elevation of HOB angle from 0 to 30 degree significantly increases IAP. It seems that the measurement of
IAP at HOB angle 15± was more reliable than 30±.
Keywords :
Pressure , Intra-abdominal Hypertension , Head of Bed , Critical care , Compartment syndrome , Supine Position