Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring in intubated patients with and without COVID-19 in the ICU: a prospective cohort study

Objective: The present study was conducted to compare mechanically ventilated patients with and without COVID-19 in terms of hemodynamic instability using cardiovascular indicators. Methods: This prospective cohort study assigned intubated and mechanically ventilated patients to two groups, i.e. with COVID-19 and without COVID-19. The hemodynamic parameters measured and compared between the two groups on the first day of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and the following four consecutive days using an ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) included cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), stroke volume (SV), flow time corrected (FTc), minute distance (MD) and potential kinetic energy (PKE). Results: Forty-three patients (males: 62.7%) were assigned to the COVID-19 group and 40 (males: 64.1%) to the one without COVID-19. Insignificant differences were observed between the two groups at baseline in terms of the mean homodynamic variablesmeasured using the USCOM(P 0.05). The mean CO increased (P=0.020), the mean SVR insignificantly changed (P=0.267), the meanMD increased (P=0.005) and PKE decreased (P=0.066) in the COVID-19 group during the five days of evaluation. In the same period, themean COinsignificantly changed (P=0.937), the mean SVR increased (P=0.028) and changes inMD(P=0.808) and PKE (P=0.539) were insignificant in the group without COVID-19. The two groups were not significantly different in terms of the other homodynamic parameters during the follow-up (P 0.05). Conclusion: The five-day changes in the USCOM-measured homodynamic parameters were lower in the group without COVID-19 compared to in that with COVID-19. In the group without COVID-19, no statisticallysignificant differences were observed between the mean follow-up values of the variables, excluding SVR, and their baseline values.