Title of article :
Long-Term Results of Posterolateral Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy and its Comparison with the Conventional Anterior Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy Method in the Management of Urologic Complications in Kidney Transplant Patients
Author/Authors :
Dadkhah ، Farid Department of Urology - Shahid Modarres Hospital - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Sofimajidpour ، Hooshmand Department of Nephrology - Shahid Modarres Hospital - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Aliaskari ، Majid Department of Urology - Shahid Modarres Hospital - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Airezaei ، Amirhesam Department of Nephrology - Shahid Modarres Hospital - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Taleghani ، Saeid Department of Urology - Shahid Modarres Hospital - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Rasouli ، Mohammad Aziz Clinical Research Development Center, Kowsar Hospital - Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences , Sofimajidpour ، Heshmatollah Department of Urology - Faculty of Medicine - Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
From page :
120
To page :
125
Abstract :
Purpose: Urological complications are common and serious in kidney transplant patients. Correct diagnosis of urological complications and rapid intervention are very important to maintain the transplanted organ. Using endoscopic methods and rapid access to ureteral orifice can be effective in treatment and management of urological complications in transplant patients. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 934 medical records of kidney transplant patients who underwent surgery through Posterolateral Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy (PLEVUNC) and anterior extravesical ureteroneocystostomy (AEVUNC) techniques from 2011 to 2018 were evaluated. The outcomes of PLEVUNC and AEVUNC techniques were evaluated in 461 and 473 transplant patients, respectively. The patients were followed up for 60 months. Immediate and delayed complications, urological complications requiring endoscopic intervention, duration of access to ureteral orifice, as well as ureteroscopic and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean and ± SD (standard deviation) age of patients in PLEVUNC and AEVUNC groups were 46.2 7± 2.7 years and 47.3 ± 3.6 years, respectively. Urinary leakage and UTI were the most common immediate (7% and 6.2%) and delayed (5.5% and 5.5%) complications in both groups, respectively. The time to find ureteral orifice in patients requiring endoscopic intervention was significantly shorter in PLEVUNC group 3.5±1.2 compared with the AEVUNC group 10 ± 4.5 (P .001). In 100% of PLEVUNC group and 62.6% of AEVUNC group, ureteral orifice of transplanted kidney was observed (P .001). Ureteroscopy was reported successful in 94.5% and 37.4% of patients in PLEVUNC and AEVUNC groups, respectively. Conclusion: Easy and safe access to the ureteral orifice and to the upper urinary tract in transplant recipients can be achieved with the PLEVUNC technique. In case of urological complications this method facilitates endoscopy.
Keywords :
kidney transplantation , ureteroneocystostomy , urological complications , urologic surgical procedures
Journal title :
Urology Journal
Journal title :
Urology Journal
Record number :
2740510
Link To Document :
بازگشت