AN ANALYSIS OF CASE STUDY ON HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATION

The mismatch between awareness and experience is a worldwide issue that leads to excessive health spending. In order for the void to be answered and the issue to be handled, there are various models and systems. The PARIHS Paradigm emphasizes the interaction of three key elements: information, meaning and facilitation, to effectively carry out practical research. It is used to assess the situation and to lead the transformation process. The goal was to depart from Iran s healthcare management system the current state of information adoption. With an objective to offer a complete systemic interview with 15 health care managers, this qualitative study used a guideline content evaluations method. Three important components of the framework have been addressed in the guiding questions: evidence, meaning and facilitation. The most significant forms of evidence used by administrators in decision-making were local knowledge and previous experience. The assessment acquired more weight compared to other sub-elements, such as society and leadership. As far as facilitation is concerned, the majority thinks that more activities should be undertaken. Findings of the author have revealed that managers in Iran s health systems decide on the basis of their own competency and other management specialists and local know-how.