Author/Authors :
Jahanshahi ، Alireza Diabetes Research Center, Health Research Institute - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Asoodeh Sarshoori ، Atefeh Department of Internal Medicine - School of Medicine - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Rashidi ، Homeira Diabetes Research Center, Health Research Institute - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Zaman ، Ferdos Diabetes Research Center, Health Research Institute - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Moradi ، Leila Diabetes Research Center, Health Research Institute - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Background: Accurate evaluation of response to treatment in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the sine qua non of preventing over-treatment in low-risk patients and implementing appropriate interventions in high-risk individuals. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the response to therapy in DTC patients based on dynamic stratification method. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 154 medical records of subjects with DTC (with at least 6 months after total thyroidectomy) and referred to endocrinology clinics in Ahvaz, Iran, from April 2020 to May 2021 were examined. Patients were stratified according to a dynamic risk stratification system (informed by their specific clinical, histopathological, and ultrasonography findings, and other diagnostic imagines) into four groups: Excellent response (ER), indeterminate response (IR), biochemical incomplete response (BIR), and structural incomplete response (SIR). Results: For a mean follow-up period of 28.59 months, excellent response to treatment was observed in 92 patients (59.7%), indeterminate response to treatment was found in 32 patients (20.8%), biochemical incomplete response was detected in 2 patients (1.3%), and structural incomplete response was seen in 28 patients (18.2%). In the group with low risk of recurrence, ER and IR were observed in 79.2% and 15.6% of the patients, respectively (P 0.0001). In the group with an intermediate risk of recurrence, ER was found in 32% of the patients, while IR and SIR + BIR were seen in 34% and 34% of the patients, respectively (P 0.0001). No cases of ER or IR were observed in the group with high risk (P = 0.001). Conclusions: In sum, response to treatment significantly varied based on dynamic risk stratification, with ER being highest in the low-risk group, less likely in moderate risk group, and undetected in the high-risk group.
