Author/Authors :
Lannes، نويسنده , , W.J.، نويسنده , , Schneider، نويسنده , , H.، نويسنده , , Jones، نويسنده , , J.A.، نويسنده , , Spalding، نويسنده , , M.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Up rated substations have
proven to be a viable economic alternative
to rebuilding in order to increase system
capacityʹ. The key economic factor in
uprated designs is the use of lower than
traditional insulation margins in high
voltage substations. The experience of
these uprated substations has been good
and insulation design procedures for
uprated substations have been developed
to show other engineers how to take
advantage of this design alternative ʹ.
While these design procedures and other
publications including the results of
actual tests have given ample evidence of
the success of the uprated designs, it has
been noted that several areas need more
study and testing. Among those areas
which need further study are the effects of
the dynamic forces caused by higher faultcurrents in the uprated substations and
the ability of the reduced creepage
distances of the uprated design to
withstand pollution severity. This study
covers the pollution severity issue by
examining the results of flashover tests on
the uprated substation insulators under
various contamination conditions. The
tests, which were done at the EPRI Power
Deliver Center at Lenox, are believed to
be the only flashover tests ever conducted
with uprated insulators. As might be
expected, the uprated design is shown to
be very sensitive to pollution severity.
Sites chosen for uprating should include a
pollution severity assessment as part of
the design review.