Author/Authors :
Tommi Raij، نويسنده , , A.B.، نويسنده , , Johnsen، نويسنده , , K.، نويسنده , , Dickerson، نويسنده , , R.F.، نويسنده , , Lok، نويسنده , , B.C.، نويسنده , , Cohen، نويسنده , , M.S.، نويسنده , , Duerson، نويسنده , , M.، نويسنده , , Pauly، نويسنده , , R.R.، نويسنده , , Stevens، نويسنده , , A.O.، نويسنده , , Wagner، نويسنده , , P.، نويسنده , , Lind، نويسنده , , D.S.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
This paper provides key insights into the construction and evaluation of interpersonal simulators—systems that enable
interpersonal interaction with virtual humans. Using an interpersonal simulator, two studies were conducted that compare interactions
with a virtual human to interactions with a similar real human. The specific interpersonal scenario employed was that of a medical
interview. Medical students interacted with either a virtual human simulating appendicitis or a real human pretending to have the same
symptoms. In Study I ðn ¼ 24Þ, medical students elicited the same information from the virtual and real human, indicating that the
content of the virtual and real interactions were similar. However, participants appeared less engaged and insincere with the virtual
human. These behavioral differences likely stemmed from the virtual human’s limited expressive behavior. Study II ðn ¼ 58Þ explored
participant behavior using new measures. Nonverbal behavior appeared to communicate lower interest and a poorer attitude toward
the virtual human. Some subjective measures of participant behavior yielded contradictory results, highlighting the need for objective,
physically-based measures in future studies.
Keywords :
user interfaces , interaction styles , computer graphics , medicine. , Intelligent agents , Virtual Reality , human-centered computing , Evaluation/methodology