Title of article
Comparison of Four Freely Available Frameworks for Image Processing and Visualization That Use ITK
Author/Authors
Bitter، نويسنده , , I.، نويسنده , , Van Uitert، نويسنده , , R.، نويسنده , , Wolf، نويسنده , , I.، نويسنده , , Ibanez، نويسنده , , L.، نويسنده , , Kuhnigk، نويسنده , , J.-M.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
11
From page
483
To page
493
Abstract
Most image processing and visualization applications allow users to configure computation parameters and manipulate the
resulting visualizations. SCIRun, VolView, MeVisLab, and the Medical Interaction Toolkit (MITK) are four image processing and
visualization frameworks that were built for these purposes. All frameworks are freely available and all allow the use of the ITK C++
library. In this paper, the benefits and limitations of each visualization framework are presented to aid both application developers and
users in the decision of which framework may be best to use for their application. The analysis is based on more than 50 evaluation
criteria, functionalities, and example applications. We report implementation times for various steps in the creation of a reference
application in each of the compared frameworks. The data-flow programming frameworks, SCIRun and MeVisLab, were determined to
be best for developing application prototypes, while VolView was advantageous for nonautomatic end-user applications based on
existing ITK functionalities, and MITK was preferable for automated end-user applications that might include new ITK classes
specifically designed for the application.
Keywords
Visualization framework , image processing , User interface , Evaluation. , COMPARISON
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS
Record number
402062
Link To Document