Abstract :
This essay raises the question of the spectrum of subjects relevant to analysis as a basis for urban planning and design. It suggests (1) examination of professional procedures which may reveal spheres excluded from conventional studies, and (2) experimentation with such new spheres which may clarify their affinity to and influence on planning and urban design. Two workshops which tackled these attempts as connected with Tel Aviv are described. Their conclusions reveal latent values uncomfortable as bases for conventional planning. Following Cassirerʹs position, the article proposes not to reject those findings, but to develop a multi-faceted critical approach and a variety of background studies for planning and urban design.
