• Title of article

    Ranking and selection of power expansion alternatives for multiple objectives under uncertainty

  • Author/Authors

    G. Heinrich Thommen، نويسنده , , L. Basson، نويسنده , , B. Cohen، نويسنده , , M. Howells، نويسنده , , Keith J. Petrie، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    20
  • From page
    2350
  • To page
    2369
  • Abstract
    Strategic planning in the electricity supply industry is a complex task due to the multiple and often conflicting objectives of the decision makers, as well as the inherent technical and valuation uncertainties involved. As such, a transparent decision support framework is needed, for guiding information management throughout the decision process, in a way which shapes decision outcomes, and enables confident choices to be made. This paper outlines a methodology for the ranking of power expansion alternatives given multiple objectives and uncertainty, and demonstrates this using the South African electricity supply industry. This methodology uses a value function MCDA approach that is augmented with scenario analysis to yield information relating to both the relative performance and credibility of power expansion alternatives. A portfolio of preferred alternatives is then identified based on performance and confidence criteria. Finally a more detailed analysis of the reduced solution set examines short-term technology investment details alongside attribute performance information, so as to gain insight into the decision problem and relate it back to real life actions.
  • Keywords
    Electricity planning , Multiple criteria decision analysis , value function , Uncertainty
  • Journal title
    Energy
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    Energy
  • Record number

    417209